Cases 1 - 7 of 7
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 22-55139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant / Appellee:
THEO WHITE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections, J. YATES and others
Defendant:
E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and JAMES E. TILTON
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 20-56349
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HAWS, MATTHEW CATE, B. FLORES, Correctional Counselor I and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant:
JAMES E. TILTON, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 2:2011cv09123
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Intervenor:
S. Baek, S. Dado, G. Hinkle and others
Defendant:
Bush, Matthew Cates, B. Flores and others
Unknown:
David A. Carrillo, Samantha H. Ramsey, Samantha H. Ramsey and others
916) 324-5205 (fax:
James Edmund Flynn, Constance Lee Picciano, Constance Lee Picciano and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
T. Nguyen, C. Russ, Spotted Eagle Circle and others
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
530) 752-5788 (fax:
Carter Capps White
Reagan v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00844
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn R. Reagan
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
REAGAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44955
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. REAGAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Davis v. EMCF Commissary Canteen Dept. et al
as 4:2010cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
EMCF Commissary Canteen Dept., C. D. Wooten and R. Reagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 09-16221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant - Appellant:
THEO WHITE, Warden and JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections
Defendant:
E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief of Inmate Appeal, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
