Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Smith v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Petitioner:
Michael R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Progressive Insurance
as 5:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Smith and Michael Ray Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Smith v. Progressive Insurance
as 5:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middletown Professional Park Office Condominiums Council of Co-Owners, Inc. v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00793
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Revenue, Division of Collections, Service Financial Company, Unknown Heirs of Jackie W. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Middletown Professional Park Office Condominiums Council of Co-Owners, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Smith v. Sentinel Echo et al
as 6:2018cv00218
Defendant:
Lexington Herald Leader, WKYT.18 News, Nita Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Smith and Joshua Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 6:2017cv00295
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garrell Associates, Inc. v. Jack Smith Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Garrell Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Smith Companies, Inc. , John R. Smith , Tim Jones Custom Home Design and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bates v. Saad et al
as 6:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Donald Choya Bates
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, R. Mulac, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Parks et al
as 5:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Smith
Defendant:
Paul Parks , Brad Hislope and City of Harrodsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. SSA
as 6:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
April R. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
