Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Judge Peter C. Dedded, Judge Ronda Trupp, Judge David Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 4:2020cv07703
Defendant:
E. Vehbe, Michall R. Smyth, G. Marlon and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2020cv00733
Defendant:
Michael R. Smyth, Christopher J. Ploud, San Diego County and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2020cv00704
Defendant:
Judge Amalia L. Meza, Judge Peter C. Deddeh, Judge Charles G. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smyth et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15900
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Smyth and Albert R. Smyth
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smyth et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-15900
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Smyth and Albert R. Smyth
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Smythe v. Raycom Media, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael R Smythe
Defendant:
Raycom Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
