Cases 1 - 7 of 7
RCHFU, et al v. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, et al
as 21-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RCHFU, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, JEFFREY A. BAYER, GAIL L. BAYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., ASPEN HIGHLANDS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, a Colorado non-profit corporation and others
Wexler v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv01684
Defendant:
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Wexler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gregory Wersal v. Patrick Sexton, etc., et al
as 09-1578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Wersal
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick D. Sexton, in his official capacity as Chair of the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards, William J. Egan, in his official capacity as a Member of the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards, Douglas A. Fuller, in his official capacity as a Member of the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards and others
Wersal v. Sexton et al
as 0:2008cv00613
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wersal, Gregory Wersal, Gregory Wersal and others
Defendant:
Patrick D. Sexton, William J. Egan, Douglas A. Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 5:2007cv02928
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 6:2007cv01417
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wexler v. Commonwealth Edison Co. et al
as 1:2007cv02318
Plaintiff:
Saul R. Wexler and Saul R. Wexler
Defendant:
Commonwealth Edison Co., Commonwealth Edison Co., Commonwealth Edison Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
