Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Spratley v. Turner et al
as 2:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Matthew Spratley
Defendant:
S. Turner, Ms. Witt and R. Woodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Edmonds et al
as 1:2018cv00180
Plaintiff:
Erin D. Proctor
Defendant:
Larry T. Edmonds, Washington, M. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv12674
Plaintiff:
Carol R. Woodson
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shadeed et al v. Green et al
as 3:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Andre Smoot Shadeed, Edward J. Walker, Jr., Muwakkil S. Shabazz and others
Defendant:
T. Green, Lt. Wright, M. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVinche Albritton v. Edward Wright
as 15-8041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD WRIGHT, Warden of Lawrenceville Correctional Center, MR. MORGAN, Former Unit Manager of 30 building, MS. BACON, Former counselor of 30 building and others
Muhjadin v. Newby et al
as 3:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Abdul Wali Salam Muhjadin
Defendant:
Newby, Williams, Depriest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2015cv01285
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Woodson
Defendant:
Ortiz, Orduna, M. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chauncey Williams v. A. D. Jame
as 15-6761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. D. JAMES, Sussex II, Institutional Ombudsman and R. WOODSON, Regional Ombudsman
LordMaster v. Birckhead et al
as 1:2015cv00618
Plaintiff:
Frankie Jae LordMaster
Defendant:
Ms. Birckhead, S. Hatch, W. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenya Parker v. Rose Brown
as 15-6557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENYA BASIL PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSE BROWN, Institutional Ombudsman, J. GREENWOOD, Operations Manager and R. WOODSON, Regional Ombudsman Service Unit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
