Cases 1 - 10 of 100
R.S. v. Gray, et al.
as 26-3936
Plaintiff:
R.S.
Defendant:
JUDSON GRAY, BEN PICUOS, KITSAP COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Jane Doe (S.F.), et al v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
as 26-11899
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE (S.F.), JOHN DOE 4 (R.G.), JANE DOE 16 (R.S.) and others
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Jason Samm, et al., v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,
as 2:2026cv04885
Plaintiff:
R.S., J.S., Jr., J.S. and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
R.S. v. Olympic Multi-Family Management, et al.
as 26-2201
Plaintiff:
R.S.
Defendant:
JUDSON GRAY, BEN PICUOS, in his official capacity as Fire Marshal for the City of Bremerton, WA, ROBERT MATHISEN and others
R.S. v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Insurance Company et al
as 1:2026cv11639
Plaintiff:
R.S.
Defendant:
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Insurance Company, Point32Health and The HMO for Individual Members Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
N.G. et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2026cv02994
Plaintiff:
N.G., R.L., R.S. and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
R.S. Trading Corp. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv02499
Plaintiff:
R.S. Trading Corp.
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-10249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
