Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Coos County et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01095
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Frank Peter Boer, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Doe Defendants 1 through 10 and coos county
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Medford v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2019op45110
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mark Timney, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
The City of Medford v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 1:2019cv10262
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Mark Timney and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wilson v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2019op45026
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Sackler, Paulo Costa, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 2:2018cv05595
Defendant:
RICHARD SACKLER, PAULO COSTA, BEVERLY SACKLER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siebler v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2018op46176
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Sackler, Paulo Costa, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Siebler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siebler v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2018cv23684
Defendant:
Richard Sackler, Paulo Costa, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Siebler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendriks v. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00176
Defendant:
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. , Fredric Eshelman , Raymond Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hendriks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendriks v. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv00228
Defendant:
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. , Fredric Eshelman , Raymond Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hendriks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
