Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SLOOTH Inc et al v. Kickz et al
as 4:2026cv00035
Plaintiff:
SLOOTH Inc
Defendant:
Kickz doing business as Ramadan Shabazz
Interested Party:
Marcus Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
America v. Shabazz
as 2:2025mc50588
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ramadan Shabazz
Garnishee:
Garnishee Educational Employees Credit Union
Kickz et al v. Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00824
Defendant:
ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas, Chubb National Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ramadan Shabazz and Kickz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brown v. Corsini, et al
as 09-2491
Plaintiff:
RAMADAN SHABAZZ
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES C. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CORSINI, Superintendent, Bay State Correctional Center, WAYNE WHISLER, Director of Engineering, Bay State Correctional Center, JEFFREY FALLON, Inner Perimeter Security, Bay State Correctional Center and others
Defendant:
SEAN MADERIOS, Director of Security, Bay State Correctional Center and KRISTIE LADOUCER, Grievance Coordinator, Department of Corrections
Shabazz v. Corsini, et al
as 09-2490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMADAN SHABAZZ
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CORSINI, Superintendent, Bay State Correctional Center, WAYNE WHISLER, Director of Engineering, Bay State Correctional Center, JEFFREY FALLON, Inner Perimeter Security, Bay State Correctional Center and others
Defendant:
SEAN MADERIOS, Director of Security, Bay State Correctional Center and KRISTIE LADOUCER, Grievance Coordinator, Department of Corrections
Brown et al v. Corsini et al
as 1:2007cv11663
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown and Ramadan Shabazz
Defendant:
Michael Corsini, Wayne Whilser, Jeffrey Fallon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
