Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Padilla v. Arredondo et al
as 3:2020cv00828
Plaintiff:
Ramon Padilla
Defendant:
P. Covello, L. Arredondo and S.K. Hemenway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Padilla et al v. Dutch Express, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv06424
Plaintiff:
Carlton Matthews , Ramon Padilla , Carlton Mathews and others
Defendant:
Dutch Express, LLC, Dutch Express II LLC, Marcus Hoed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOMBO, et al. v. PADILLA
as 2:2014cv02851
Plaintiff:
LISA LOMBO and RAMON PADILLA
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , TARGET STORES , WEATHERPROOFING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padilla v. Maxx Mail, Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv01222
Plaintiff:
Ramon Padilla
Defendant:
Maxx Mail, Ltd. , Van P. Marcus and John Does # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith et al v. IMS Service Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv09551
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith , Terrence Daniels , Allen McNeal and others
Defendant:
IMS Service Corp., Vincent Curcio, Jr., Anthony Curcio and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Ramon Padilla-Avilez
as 10-40795
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMON PADILLA-AVILEZ
Padilla-Alvilez v. United States Of America DO NOT DOCKET. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN CRIMINAL CASE #2:08cr216.
as 2:2009cv00304
Petitioner:
Ramon Padilla-Alvilez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jose Saul Padilla et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramirez Aguilar, Juan Carlos Reyes Amaya, Lucio Lazaro Reyes Amaya and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
USA v. Padilla-Avilez
as 08-40977
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMON PADILLA-AVILEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
