Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv01413
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Corazon De Cristo Cano, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-56094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORAZON DE CRISTO CANO, TERRY HARDIN, CRYSTAL IRVIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Corazon De Cristo Cano, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-55544
Plaintiff:
CORAZON DE CRISTO CANO, TERRY HARDIN, CRYSTAL IRVIN and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
ROJAS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39237
Plaintiff:
RAMON ROJAS JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Edguin Rojas-Torres
as 20-50516
Defendant / Appellant:
EDGUIN RAMON ROJAS-TORRES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramon Rojas Gil v. Andrew Saul
as 8:2019cv02512
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ramon Rojas Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ramon Rojas Gil v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2019cv10930
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ramon Rojas Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ramon Rojas-Ortega v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72816
Petitioner:
RAMON ROJAS-ORTEGA, AKA Francisco Rojas
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Figueroa v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv06203
Plaintiff:
Ramon Rojas Figueroa
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
