Cases 71 - 80 of 10,262
Ruiz Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1805
Petitioner:
JULIA MARINA RUIZ RAMOS and CHELSEY YAHAIRA FELIPE RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Raby v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10761
Plaintiff:
Gerald Raby
Defendant:
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. f/k/a NewHold Investment Corp., Peter George, Mario Ramos and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Puerto Rico Ports Authority v. Caldwell
as 24-1272
Plaintiff:
PUERTO RICO PORTS AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EMMETT W. CALDWELL, CHRISTIAN T. DE JESUS, JOSE NIEVES-SALDANA and others
USA v. Ponce
as 24-40187
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marvin Ramon Ramos Ponce, also known as Marvin Ramon Ponce, also known as Eddie Ponce Contreras, also known as Eddie Ponce, also known as Rafael Ramos-Egardeo
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner:
Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Cuevas-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Javier J. Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Cuevas-Ramos, Carmen Ramona Natal-Perez, Edgardo Luis Cuevas-Natal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1706
Petitioner:
LUIS ERASMO CASTRO RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Mariscal v. Garland
as 24-1710
Petitioner:
LUIS RODOLFO RAMOS MARISCAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
