Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PENDLETON v. TODD et al
as 2:2024cv00884
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and RANDAL B. TODD
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROHM v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv01284
Petitioner:
DAVE ROHM
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and HON. JUDGE RANDALL B. TODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) et al
as 2:2016cv01161
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION(S) , HEATHER HILDENBRANDT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
PENDLETON v. TODD et al
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TODD, RAYMOND A. NOVAK, KATE BARKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. TODD et al
as 2:2015cv00648
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TODD, RICHARD OLAZ, KENNETH DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) et al
as 2:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA), SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORVELL v. TODD
as 2:2014cv01691
Plaintiff:
MARK STEVEN NORVELL
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TODD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. TODD et al
as 2:2013cv01462
Petitioner:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Respondent:
RANDAL B. TODD, ADMINISTRATOR, PRESIDENT JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lynne Thompson v. Randal Todd, et al
as 13-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TODD, Individually, ALLEGHENY COUNTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS and others
THOMPSON v. TODD et al
as 2:2012cv01188
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TODD, ALLEGHENY COUNTY EXECUTIVE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
