Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06410
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DENNIS LINK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shanika Day, et al v. Franklin Wooten, et al
as 19-1972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANIKA DAY, individualy, and as the Administrator for the ESTATE OF TERRELL DAY and HARVEY MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDALL DENNY and FRANKLIN WOOTEN, Sergeant
Shanika Day, et al v. Franklin Wooten, et al
as 19-1930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANIKA DAY, individualy, and as the Administrator for the ESTATE OF TERRELL DAY and HARVEY MORGAN
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL DENNY and FRANKLIN WOOTEN, Sergeant
Thomas v. City of Berkeley, Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Bruce Thomas
Defendant:
City of Berkeley, Missouri, Frank McCall, Antwan Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bank of America, N.A. v. Randall Dennis, et al
as 13-2340
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., fka Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDALL DENNIS, PHYLLIS DENNIS and ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, 52 CRESCENT RD., WATERFORD, MICHIGAN 48327-2710
Bank of America, N.A. v. Randall Dennis, et al
as 13-1767
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., fka Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDALL DENNIS, PHYLLIS DENNIS and ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, 52 CRESCENT RD., WATERFORD, MICHIGAN 48327-2710
Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Dennis, et al
as 2:2012cv11821
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Defendant:
Randall Dennis , Phyllis Dennis and All other occupants, 52 Crescent Rd., Waterford, Michigan 48327-2710
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
