Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Adams v. Lewis et al
as 1:2022mc00012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Randall Lewis, Luke Burns, Alan Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuntz et al v. Lewis et al (TV2)
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Rachel L. Kuntz, R.D.B. and Roseanne Kuntz
Defendant:
Randal Lewis, Andrea Lewis and Chad Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company v. 815 Pallets Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00909
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company
Defendant:
815 PALLETS INC. dba CALCO PALLETS, LLC, RANDALL LEWIS TAYLOR and 815 Pallets Inc an Illinois corporation doing business as Calco Pallets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Randall Lewis v. David Holbrook
as 20-71208
Petitioner:
RANDALL LEWIS
Respondent:
DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden
Lewis v. Finch et al
as 1:2020cv00084
Defendant:
Unknown Prest, United States Marshals, Jason Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Finch et al
as 1:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Unknown Prest, United States Marshals, Jason Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rankin, Frederick Hackney, Donald Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27202
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEWEY RANDALL LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GASS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11367
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LEWIS GASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randall Lewis v. Neil McDowell
as 20-70213
Petitioner:
RANDALL LEWIS
Respondent:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
