Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Meeks v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Meeks
Defendant:
Jarrod Peters, Randolph County Sheriff's Office, Chris Guisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Randolph County Jail
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. TERRY
Defendant:
Randolph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wolff et al
as 3:2020cv01337
Defendant:
Randolph County Sheriff's Department, Jarrod Peters, Deputy Sheriff Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Randolph County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv01280
Defendant:
Randolph County Sheriff's Department, Jarrod Peters, Austin Peck and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hackney v. US Marshals Service et al
as 3:2020cv00015
Defendant:
C/O Middendorf, Jarod Peters, US Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Q. Hackney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decker v. Randolph County Jail
as 3:2018cv02041
Plaintiff:
Joseph Decker
Defendant:
Randolph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace et al v. Rauner et al
as 3:2018cv01513
Plaintiff:
Rafael E. Santos, Jr. and Corrie Wallace
Defendant:
Bruce Rauner, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Lashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Randolph County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv01332
Defendant:
Nena and Randolph County Jail
Plaintiff:
Frank Joe Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FRANKLIN et al v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2018cv01340
Plaintiff:
TRACI M FRANKLIN and WILLIAM FRANKLIN
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, RANDOLPH COUNTY SHERIFF and WINCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ASHLEY v. RANDOLPH COUNTY, INDIANA
as 1:2018cv00621
Plaintiff:
BETTY ASHLEY
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
