Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Raul Padilla-Ruiz v. Communication Technologies
as 19-1156
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
RICHARD ROE, respective insurance company, JOHN CRAY, respective insurance company and JOHN DOE, respective insurance company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP, Legal Society of Earnings, VIVIAN J. FRANCESCHINI-RODRIGUEZ and RAUL PADILLA-RUIZ
PADILLA-RUIZ et al v. COMTEK COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al
as 2:2016cv00630
Plaintiff:
RAUL PADILLA-RUIZ , VIVIAN J. FRANCESCHINI-RODRIGUEZ and CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP (Legal Society of Earnings)
Defendant:
COMTEK COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JOHN CRAY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Padilla-Ruiz, et al v. US, et al
as 12-2368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL PADILLA-RUIZ, VIVIAN J. FRANCESCHINI-RODRIGUEZ and CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP, Padilla-Franceschini
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ROSA E. RODRIGUEZ-VELEZ and others
Padilla-Ruiz et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01393
Plaintiff:
Raul Padilla-Ruiz , Vivian J. Franceschini-Rodriguez and Conjugal Partnership Padilla-Franceschini
Defendant:
United States of America, Eric Holder, Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez and others
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Padilla-Ruiz et al v. COMTEK COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv01695
Plaintiff:
Raul Padilla-Ruiz, Viviana Franceschini-Rodriguez and Conjugal Partnership
Defendant:
COMTEK COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., John Cray and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
