Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Ellis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03465
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Joan Ellis and William Ray Ellis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NCAA v. USDC-CAOAK
as 14-71522
:
In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Petitioner:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
SAMUEL MICHAEL KELLER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, EDWARD C. O'BANNON, Jr., BRYON BISHOP and others
Edward O'Bannon, Jr., et al v. NCAA
as 14-80060
Plaintiff - Respondent:
EDWARD C. O'BANNON, Jr., OSCAR P. ROBERTSON, WILLIAM RUSSELL and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Ellis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and Sal Evola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and Ben Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 4:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and Will Casey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. City of Pittsburg et.al.
as 4:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and Joe Sbranti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. City of Pittsburg
as 3:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and Pete Longmire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
