Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tadlock v. LaHood We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3088
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY K. TADLOCK
Defendant - Appellee: RAY LAHOOD, Secretary of the Department of Transportation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35225
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35168
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05928
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3194
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Tennessee, et al v. Kathy Noble
as 13-5752
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, WILLIAM HASLAM, SCOTT FOSTER, Hendersonville Mayor and others
Defendant - Appellant: KATHY NOBLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
State of Tennessee et al v. Noble
as 3:2013cv00295
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee, William Haslam, Scott Foster and others
Defendant: Kathy Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00177
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?