Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Gorbey v. OBAMA
as 17-6035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, United States President Washington D.C., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington DC, LINDSEY GRAHAM, U.S. Senate South Carolina and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00330
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lawrence Leo Hawkins, Jr. v. Raymond A. Jackson
as 14-6092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LEO HAWKINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND A. JACKSON, DOUGLAS E. MILLER and TOMMY E. MILLER
Hawkins v. Jackson et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Leo Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond A. Jackson, Douglas E. Miller and Tommy E. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
