Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DAVIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00130
Plaintiff: QYMOAN DAVIS
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, Warden REAGAN BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Glover v. Reagan Black, et al
as 22-13635
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. GLOVER
Defendant / Appellee: REAGAN BLACK, in his individual and official capacity, BYRD, Grievance Counselor and COFIELD
GARNER v. JAMERSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff: KRYSTEN GARNER
Defendant: ANTONIA JAMERSON, WARREN BALTES, JUSTIN MOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. BLACK
as 4:2021cv00206
Petitioner: JONATHAN BRUCE WALKER
Defendant: Reagan Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. BLACK
as 4:2021cv00197
Petitioner: JONATHAN BRUCE WALKER
Defendant: Warden REAGAN BLACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GLOVER v. BLACK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00130
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A GLOVER
Defendant: Warden REAGAN BLACK, Deputy Warden L BURKS, Ms. SINGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUNN v. JONES
as 1:2021cv00592
Respondent: Reagan Black and Deshawn Jones
Petitioner: KENNETH BERNARD GUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GLOVER v. BLACK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00003
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A GLOVER
Defendant: Warden REAGAN BLACK, Deputy Warden L BURKS, Ms. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. KEMP et al
as 4:2020cv00302
Plaintiff: CHARLES MYRON TAYLOR, II and ABDULLAH MUMIM CALIPH HAMID TAYLOR
Defendant: RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON, Warden REAGAN BLACK, Governor BRIAN P KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUNN v. BLACK
as 4:2020cv00277
Petitioner: KENNETH BERNARD GUNN
Respondent: Warden REAGAN BLACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?