Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Michael L. Overton v. Warden CMC East et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff: Michael L. Overton
Defendant: Warden CMC East, Bank of the West C.E.O., Kevin Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overton v. Warden CMC East et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00632
Plaintiff: Michael L. Overton
Defendant: Warden CMC East, Bank of the West C.E.O., Kevin Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al.
as 24-179
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacity as the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35587
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
(PC) Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01307
Plaintiff: Corey R Ryland
Defendant: Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35569
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Emilio Reyes v. USDOI, et al
as 23-55460
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMILIO REYES
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and AMY DUTSCHKE, in her official capacity as Regional Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs Pacific Regional Office
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associatio, et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
as 23-15599
Plaintiff / Appellant: PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, FRIENDS OF THE RIVER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and SAN LUIS & DELTA MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: GRASSLAND WATER DISTRICT
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae: LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?