Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Kennedy v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 5:2019cv02092
Defendant:
Austin Evans, Misty L. Peterson, Robert Hays and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv03852
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SCOTT SMITH
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KENNEDY v. EQUIFAX, INC. et al
as 5:2018cv00214
Plaintiff:
EDWARD T. KENNEDY
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC., RICHARD F. SMITH, AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Aina v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv02270
Plaintiff:
Andre Yanick Aina
Defendant:
Richard C. Smith, Koleno, Rusnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2017cv03852
Petitioner:
RICHARD M. SMITH
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ridge v. Giglio et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Luther T. Ridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael A. Giglio, Larry R. Snyder, Jorge E. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCKETT v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv01636
Petitioner:
TRAMALE LOCKETT
Respondent:
RICHARD C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockett v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv01843
Plaintiff:
Tramale Lockett
Defendant:
Delker, Woods, Kimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COMMON PLEAS ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv00049
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEE SMITH, SR.
Respondent:
COMMON PLEAS ALLEGHENY COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gass v. Smith
as 3:2014cv01738
Petitioner:
John A Gass
Respondent:
Richard C Smith and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
