Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Latham v. Stearns
as 24-1307
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARD G. STEARNS, Honorable
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Latham v. Stearns
as 1:2023cv12041
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
The Honorable Richard G. Stearns
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Douglas Woodlock, et al
as 20-5321
Defendant / Appellee:
Rod J. Rosenstein, In Individual and Official Capacities, Jennifer Beckwith, In Individual and Official Capacities, Andrew E. Lelling, In Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
AZUBUKO v. STORY et al
as 1:2019cv03856
Defendant:
RICHARD G. STEARNS, JENNIFER BECKWITH, DOUGLAS PRESETON WOODLOCK and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Strahan v. Stearns, et al
as 12-1830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD G. STEARNS, Judge, US District Court of the District of Massachusetts, JOHN GIBBONS, United States Marshal for Massachusetts, STEVEN DONAHER and others
LeBaron v. Meal Mart et al
as 1:2012cv11134
Plaintiff:
Nathan Marquis LeBaron
Defendant:
Meal Mart, Meal Mart Owners, Unknown Meal Mart Employees and others
Movant:
Darron J. Sherokow, Keith Ashby, Nicholus Basey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strahan v. Stearns et al
as 1:2012cv11019
Defendant:
Richard G. Stearns, John Gibbons, Steven Donaher and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Max Strahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey et al v. Stearns et al
as 1:2011cv11731
Plaintiff:
Zelma Dickey and John Dickey
Defendant:
Richard G. Stearns and U.S.District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
