Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bridges #437651 v. Rewerts
as 1:2020cv01130
Respondent:
Richard Lee Rewerts and Randee Rewerts
Petitioner:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hubbard v. Abbott Bailbonds Agency, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00294
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Richard Lee Abbott, Abbott Bailbonds Agency, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coward et al v. Richard Snyder et al
as 5:2020cv10307
Plaintiff:
E. B., Monica Embeck, Romell Barkus and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Prysby, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fortenberry #887050 v. Trierweiler
as 1:2016cv00932
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Fortenberry #887050
Respondent:
Tony Trierweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. Devere Construction Company, Incorporated et al
as 1:2016cv10421
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
Devere Construction Company, Incorporated, Crittenden Construction Company Inc, Reds Traders Limited and others
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. DeVere Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10423
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
DeVere Construction Co., Inc., Crittenden Construction Co., Inc., Reds Traders Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75
Clark #697332 v. Stoddard
as 1:2014cv00080
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Clark #697332
Respondent:
Cathleen Stoddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Remelts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Remelts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Narlock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Narlock, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
