Cases 1 - 8 of 8
KNAUF v. STRAVATO et al
as 2:2019cv01082
Defendant:
RICHARD ROBERT STRAVATO and THE HERTZ CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JUNE KNAUF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HECHT v. BOOK COUNTRY CLEARING HOUSE, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
DONNA HECHT
Defendant:
BOOK COUNTRY CLEARING HOUSE, LLC and RICHARD ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Michael Robert
as 12-3956
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RICHARD ROBERTS
SIGMAPHARM, INC. v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02522
Plaintiff:
SIGMAPHARM, INC.
Defendant:
MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. , UNITED RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC. , RICHARD ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. et al v. SPIREAS et al
as 2:2012cv00815
Plaintiff:
MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. and UNITED RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
SPIRIDON SPIREAS , ERIC WARREN GOLDMAN and HYGROSOL PHARMACEUTICAL CORP.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
SPIRIDON SPIREAS , HYGROSOL PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. and ERIC WARREN GOLDMAN
Thirdparty_defendant:
MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. , UNITED RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC. , RICHARD ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LOVE v. LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2011cv04500
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROBERTS and RICHARD ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELNYK v. PA. LEHIGH COUNTY PAROLE DEPT. et al
as 5:2008cv05671
Petitioner:
RICHARD ROBERT MELNYK
Respondent:
PA. LEHIGH COUNTY PAROLE DEPT., WARDEN OF LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PA. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GOURDINE v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 2:2007cv03733
Plaintiff:
SHAUN GOURDINE
Defendant:
PETER VAZQUEZ, RICHARD ROBERTS, BLAZE BAIL BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
