Cases 21 - 30 of 84
MAYS et al v. FIRST CHOICE PAYMENT SOLUTIONS GP
as 3:2019cv01628
Plaintiff:
MARIA KOROLYZEN, GAIL SATULOFF, RON DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
FIRST CHOICE PAYMENT SOLUTIONS GP and FIRST CHOICE PAYMENT SOLUTIONS GP doing business as SEKURE MERCHANT SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-5002
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISSA PREBLE HUTTER, DAVID BEEN, MARK KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDE LEE SAMUELS
Dover v. The Salvation Army
as 3:2018cv03212
Defendant:
The Salvation Army and Floyd Roger Cox, Jr
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STEVENS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv15756
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD STEVENS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Richard Johnson
as 18-13348
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD STEVEN JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angulo v. Vernik
as 2:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Rivera Angulo
Defendant:
Margarita Valeryevna Vernik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Boynton v. Warden
as 17-13056
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD BOYNTON, a.k.a. Richard Steven Boynton
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
