Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GUNTER v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY GUNTER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. , JASON JUNKINS , DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE et al
as 1:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE , DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA , ACTION NC and others
Defendant:
KIM WESTBROOK STRACH , RICK BRAJER , KELLY THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. BURRIS et al
as 1:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
BILLY RAY PARKER
Defendant:
RICK BURRIS, LANE BURRIS, DARRIN POPLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUNTER, et al v. TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. HUNTER , RICK A. DONATHAN and JERRY D. MEDLIN
Defendant:
TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT W. COOK and CHRISTINE W. BRALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2009cv00954
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, WILLIAM V. BELL, THOMAS J. BONFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.