Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Riley v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Colton James Riley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riley v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joshua T Riley
Defendant:
National Oilwell Varco, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Morrison
Defendant:
Joel P Ward, Joel Burks, Robert Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Deana Lunsford and Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Joshua Hyman, Cody Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor et al v. Riley
as 5:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Tory Taylor and Sommer Franklin
Defendant:
Bobby Don Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Riley v. The GoodYear Tire and Rubber Company
as 5:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Tasha Riley
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Riley v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Anita K Riley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Mays v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 5:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center, Sergent Nye, Sgt Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
