Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42090
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12454
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Robert Hernandez
as 19-51135
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE HERNANDEZ, also known as Gino
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hernandez v. Washburn
as 2:2019cv01376
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Hernandez
Respondent:
Sue Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lerma et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2019cv00368
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Kimberly Lipko, Jacob Amaru and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Mauricio Lerma and Jennifer Ann Lerma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedro Calderon v. Robert Hernandez
as 19-55177
Petitioner / Appellant:
PEDRO SAUCEDO CALDERON, AKA Carlos Martinez
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT J. HERNANDEZ, Warden
HERNANDEZ v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02826
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02565
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
