Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Robert Weddington v. National Indemnity Insurance Company
as 21-7073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CLIFFORD WEDDINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and CENTRAL EXPRESS, LLC
Weddington v. BH Motors-Mr. Bill
as 1:2021cv01768
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Defendant:
BH Motors-Mr. Bill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Weddington v. US Xpress, Inc.
as 21-6532
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT MORGAN, Adjuster, THOMAS WYATT, CHARLES LANCELOTTA, MD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CLIFFORD WEDDINGTON
Rand L Global, LLC et al v. National Indemnity Company
as 1:2021cv00524
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington and Rand L Global, LLC
Defendant:
National Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weddington v. US Xpress, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00484
Defendant:
David W. Gaw, Thomas Wyatt, Liberty Mutual Insurance Com and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robert Weddington v. US Xpress, Inc., et al
as 21-5081
Defendant / Appellee:
US XPRESS, INC. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CLIFFORD WEDDINGTON
Weddington v. Progressive Casualty Ins.
as 1:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Ins.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weddington v. North Branch Correctional Institution and Staff Members
as 8:2021cv00055
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institution and Staff Members
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Weddington v. Webco Chiemical et al
as 1:2020cv02382
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance and Webco Chiemical
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Weddington v. Detective Koons-Childrens
as 20-6177
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE KOONS-CHILDRENS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CLIFFORD WEDDINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
