Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Davis v. Kathleen MacDonald, et al
as 16-2528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN MACDONALD, Wayne County Circuit Judge, STEVEN SCHILLER, Emergency Manager of Highland Park and DENNIS POLLARD
Frederick Bates v. City of San Jose, et al
as 16-16581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, ROBERT DAVIS, City of San Jose Chief of Police and ADONNA AMOROSO, City of San Jose Police Deputy Chief of Police
Aristea Hupp, et al v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Assoc, et al
as 16-56245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARISTEA HUPP and PAUL HUPP
Defendant - Appellee:
SOLERA OAK VALLEY GREENS ASSOCIATION, KEYSTONE PACIFIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., DENNIS RICE and others
Davis v. MacDonald et al
as 2:2016cv13039
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Kathleen MacDonald, Steven Schiller and Dennis Pollard
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Schiller et al
as 2:2016cv12755
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Steven M Schiller and Steve Arwood
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. et al v. Antelope Valley Union High School District et al
as 2:2016cv02487
Plaintiff:
Antelope Valley Freethinkers, David Dionne and Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Antelope Valley Union High School District, Dana Coleman, Robert Davis and others
Aristea Hupp et al v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Association et al
as 5:2016cv00370
Defendant:
Kathy J Axberg, Richard Crowe, Arthur Kenneth Cunnigham and others
Plaintiff:
Aristea Hupp and Paul Hupp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
