Cases 21 - 30 of 523
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21804
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Robert Davis v. Eric Althauser, et al
as 23-5425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC ALTHAUSER, RODNEY WARD and JOHN DOES, sued as other unidentified Bureau of Prison Officers
DAVIES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09316
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John DavisIn re: John Davis
as 23-1380
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08807
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRAY, ROBERT DAVIES, STEVEN ALON FLOWERS HART and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bray, Robert Davies, Steven Alon Flowers Hart and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
