Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robert Davis v. Jocelyn Benson, et al
as 26-1980
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ELI SAVIT, GARLIN GILCHRIST, II and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Pequignot v. Davis et al
as 3:2026cv06039
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pequignot
Defendant:
Xiaowen Davis and Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rl Diversity-Rent Lease & Ejectment
Davis v. Michigan Secretary of State et al
as 2:2026cv13454
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis [E-filer]
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson Michigan Secretary of State, Director of State Elections, Wayne County Election Commission and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. Bisignano
as 5:2026cv00636
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Davis v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2026cv03273
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Denessa Armstrong, Daniel Conn, . Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woolfolk et al v. Davis
as 1:2026cv00206
Plaintiff:
Leeaundry A Woolfolk and Deanna S Collins
Defendant:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Akin et al
as 4:2026cv00925
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Hon. Lane Akin, Hon. Wes Wallace, Hon. James Stainton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2026cv02657
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Davis and Robert Davis
Defendant:
Tatyani Wyatt and DoorDash Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robert Davis, Jr. v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv08046
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Davis v. Logan
as 26-10580
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Brandon Logan, Officer, Individually and Officially, William Snyder, Officer, Individually and Officially, Wes Wallace, Captain, Individually and Officially and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.