Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2139
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Palmer v. Philpot, et al
as 08-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY PHILPOT, Sheriff of Sequoyah County, FRANKLIN LIGHTFOOT, Individually, ROBERT GUDE, Individually and others
Palmer v. Sequoyah County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dennis Palmer
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Board of County Commissioners, Sequoyah County Board of County Commissioners, Johnny Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Allen, et al v. Rouse, et al
as 1:2000cv10981
Plaintiff:
Michael Braxton , Darryl Buchanan , Willard Clark and others
Defendant:
Richard J. Rouse , Suffolk County Sheriff's Department , Richard Feeney and others
Counter_claimant:
Richard J. Rouse , Suffolk County Sheriff's Department , Richard Feeney and others
Counter_defendant:
Darrel Allen , Kevin Bacchus , Anthony Bova and others
Movant:
Massachusetts Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
