Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Babineaux v. Southeastern Baptist College et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jody Babineauz and Jody Babineaux
Defendant:
Southeastern Baptist College and Robert Lopez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daniel E. Grigson v. Robert Lopez et al
as 2:2022cv07971
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Grigson
Defendant:
Robert Lopez, Kristen Anderson-Lopez, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Campos v. Pulliam et al
as 1:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Campos
Defendant:
Brandon T Pulliam, John Rago, Victor Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris Law Firm, LLP v. Lopez et al
as 2:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Harris Law Firm, LLP doing business as Richard Harris Law Firm and Robert Lopez
Defendant:
Advanced Spine & Rehabilitation, LLC, Allied Pain & Spine Institute and East Bay Upright MRI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
