Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stone v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15461
Plaintiff:
Robert Stone
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STONE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STONE
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, M. BRYANT, TIM GREATHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2020cv01464
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, D. WYATT, MATTHEW FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2016cv02694
Petitioner:
ROBERT STONE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STONE v. ZATECKY
as 2:2014cv00294
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ROBERT STONE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STONE v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00059
Respondent:
MR. HANKS
Petitioner:
ROBERT STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00792
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas, Jeremy White, Joseph Mueller and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
McIntyre v. McCaslin et al
as 3:2011cv50119
Plaintiff:
Veronica McIntyre
Defendant:
Brad McCaslin , Tom Fearn , Sandy Messenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Mederos
as 1:2008cv05145
Plaintiff:
Robert Stone
Defendant:
Eusebio Mederos
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
