Cases 31 - 40 of 459
Curry v. State Of New York et al
as 9:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
John Curry
Defendant:
State of New York, Rodney Young, Ms. Charvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00945
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Robinson
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Gerald Jones, Kelly Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05086
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Garcia, Sr., Lance Cruell, Jamir Riviere and others
Defendant:
City of New York and Legal Aid Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Yonkers Police Department
as 22-1762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Quamaine Dawson Robinson
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Yonkers Police Department, Michael Cox, Police Officer, Ian Gallagher, Police Officer and others
Robinson v. Bell
as 22-1700
Petitioner / Appellant:
Herman Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Earl Bell, Superintendent
Staton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, John Bowen, Oullette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv06040
Plaintiff:
Sean Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05262
Plaintiff:
John Curry
Defendant:
State of New York, Rodney Young, Ms. Charvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mickles v. Powell et al
as 1:2022cv04781
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Patrice Powell, Kayla Hall, Brittan Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2022cv03126
Petitioner:
Tyrone Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
