Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sweetbridge Group, LLC v. Robinson & Cole, LLP
as 3:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Sweetbridge Group, LLC
Defendant:
Robinson & Cole LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Inkel v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Phillip Inkel
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Richard A. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Janell Robinson
Respondent:
T. Pullen and Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In re: 88 Gerard Associates, LLC
as 3:2021mc00083
Respondent:
88 Gerard Associates, LLC
Petitioner:
Jessica Robinson, Stacey Jennings and Priscilla McGowan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robinson v. Bank of America
as 3:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Azumah Robinson
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
USA v. $9,876.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$9,876.00 in United States Currency, $2,297.00 in United States Currency, One 2020 Can-Am Ryker Rally Edition Motorcycle, VIN 3JB2GEG28LJ000911 and others
Claimant:
Jacqueline Robinson and Eddie Smalls
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00874
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
