Cases 61 - 70 of 820
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 1:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Dameron, Tremayne, Kimberly Hobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Robinson-Abernathy v. Sam's East Inc.
as 3:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Robinson-Abernathy
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc. doing business as Sam's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 1:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Tremayne Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim - Personal Injury/Motor Vehicle
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lodhi v. Hobson et al
as 1:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Kimberly Hobson, A. David Robinson, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Robinson v. Cox Cable LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Cox Cable LLC and Metro by T. Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. Metro by T. Mobile et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Metro by T. Mobile and Cox Cable
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. City of Richmond Police Department
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Clayton Robinson
Defendant:
City of Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City Attorney
as 3:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Clayton Robinson
Defendant:
City Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, D. Rose, Brian Vanover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
