Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 769
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant: GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Carl Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff: CARL E. RODGERS
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JEFFREY STINE, DEAN SHIPE and others
Fosbinder v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff: Rodger Fosbinder
Defendant: County of San Diego, Janet Elaine Patterson and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff: PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant: MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Rodgers v. Torrez
as 24-2046
Plaintiff: WESSLEY RODGERS
Defendant: RAUL TORREZ
Ocampo v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2024cv01926
Plaintiff: Carlos Ocampo
Defendant: Illinois State Police and Adam W Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1085
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00962
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1321
Plaintiff: PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff: PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?