Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Greg Knowles, et al v. ARRIS International Plc
as 19-17468
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAWORTH, DAVID S. EISEN, KELLY SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN ALEXANDER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and GREG KNOWLES
Defendant / Appellee:
ARRIS INTERNATIONAL PLC
Not Classified By Court:
INTEL CORPORATION
Carlos Reyna, et al v. ARRIS International Plc
as 18-80099
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARLOS REYNA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, GREG KNOWLES, BRIAN ALEXANDER and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
ARRIS INTERNATIONAL PLC
John Ruch v. Michelle McKenzie, et al
as 16-16175
Appellant:
ALAN GRUEN, JAMES WHITMIRE, JOSEPH SPILLANE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUCH
John Ruch v. Michelle McKenzie, et al
as 16-16175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN RUCH
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHELLE MCKENZIE, ALAN GRUEN, BROWN and others
Toole v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2016cv02909
Plaintiff:
Corey Toole
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Rodney Bryant, Joseph Spillane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Tripp
as 5:2015hc02285
Petitioner:
Rodney Bryant
Respondent:
Brick Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ruch v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2015cv03296
Plaintiff:
John Ruch
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Michelle McKenzie, Alan Gruen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phyllis Adams, et al. v. Astrazeneca, et al.
as 2:2013cv01348
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Adams, Debra Akins, Mary Allen and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Adams, et al. v. Astrazeneca, et al.
as 3:2012cv03083
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Adams , Debra Akins , Mary Allen and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
