Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Love v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Rodney Love
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Clayton Stephenson, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart et al v. Amcore Investment Group et al
as 3:2022cv50211
Plaintiff:
Edtwon Smart and Rodney Love
Defendant:
Amcore Investment Group, Kevin J. Frost and Justen Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodney Love v. David Gomez
as 21-2219
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODNEY LOVE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID GOMEZ
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv68763
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00435
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Rodney Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chestnut et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv00907
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Chestnut , Marlene Martin , Bobby Dubose and others
Defendant:
John H Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Love v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Rodney Love
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, J.F. Mitchell, C Luce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. COOK MEDICAL LLC
as 1:2016cv02598
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC
Unknown:
James McGinnis Boyers and Kip S.M. McDonald
317) 639-6444 (fax:
Douglas B. King
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Love v. Pfister et al
as 1:2016cv06869
Petitioner:
Rodney Love
Respondent:
Pfister and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Love v. Harrington et al
as 3:2015cv00937
Plaintiff:
Rodney Love
Defendant:
Richard Harrington, Shel Stillwell-Davis, Timothy R Veath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
