Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
REGAN v. JONES et al
as 2:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
LEROY REGAN
Defendant:
ROGER JONES, U.S.P. TERRE HAUTE F.B.O.P. HEALTH SERVICE DEPT. REAL PARTY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mark Brock v. William Wilson, et al
as 17-1702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM WILSON, Doctor, Clinical Director, ROGER JONES, Doctor, ALEX JASTILLANO, Physician's Assistant and others
Mark Brock v. William Wilson, et al
as 15-1130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM WILSON, Doctor, Clinical Director, ROGER JONES, Doctor, ALEX JASTILLANO, Physician's Assistant and others
BROCK v. WILSON et al
as 2:2014cv00170
Defendant:
ALLEN, JULIE BEIGHLEY, ERIC HOLDER and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BROCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roger Jones v. USA, et al
as 13-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. SETZER et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Defendant:
MD ROGER JONES, WARDEN CHARLES LOCKETT, A. SETZER and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
ROGER JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv06592
Plaintiff:
Roger Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
