Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Warriax v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv02094
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Roger Warriax
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
Warriax v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Roger Warriax
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
v. Warriax et al
as 6:2023cv02094
Defendant:
Roger Warriax and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Christy Rogers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Tufte v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Roger Tufte, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rogers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2022cv03010
Plaintiff:
Nathen S. Rogers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Mansell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2021cv05221
Plaintiff:
Roger C. Mansell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Rogers, Jr. v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02150
Plaintiff:
Roy W. Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Office of Regional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Danner v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Roger Eugene Danner
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakzi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nethercutt v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00625
Plaintiff:
Roger B. Nethercutt
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
