Cases 41 - 50 of 90
WILLIAMS v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00393
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
RONALD E. WILLIAMS, JR.
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2015cv00380
Defendant:
D. EZEKIEL and J. SIMMONS
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2015cv01814
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 2:2015cv00182
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 5:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ronald Earl Williams
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Williams v. Wayne Gavin, et al
as 15-1144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE GAVIN, Superintendent, LT. HORVATH, Sone Lieut., C.O. DANIEL DREVENEK and others
Ronald Williams v. Joseph Nish, et al
as 15-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH P. NISH, Former Superintendent, KAREN ROGERS-SWEENEY, Program Coordinator, WAYNE GAVIN, Superintendent and others
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv02620
Petitioner:
Ronald Earl Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2014cv00316
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LEANN LARIVA and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
