Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ronald Gillette v. State of Florida, et al
as 21-10032
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF VIRGIN ISLANDS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel for Citrus County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD GILLETTE
Gillette v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv02401
Defendant:
Kenneth Mapp, Steve Groom, Bureau of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gillette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant:
STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Uber FCRA Litigation
as CAN/3:14-cv-05200
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Hirease, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Kadir Mohamed , Michael Nokchan , Shannon Wise and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv05241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gillette et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04201
Plaintiff:
Sherron R. Gillette and Ronald Gillette
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillette et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 2:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
Sherron R. Gillette and Ronald Gillette
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
