Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GREENBERG v. MCEWEN et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
JASON H. GREENBERG
Defendant:
D. NEIL MCEWEN and BRUCE ROSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swinton v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
as 2:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Rosa Swinton
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN LESLIE LOVERIDGE, CAPT. MILLARD, SGT. COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01976
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
