Cases 1 - 10 of 783
Walsh et al v. Mandytoddco, Inc. et al
as 4:2025cv00758
Plaintiff:
Jena Walsh and Connor Lucas
Defendant:
Mandytoddco, Inc. and Todd Rowley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Rowley et al v. Finstad et al
as 0:2025cv02059
Plaintiff:
Coleen Rowley, William Sorem, Fiona Roedl and others
Defendant:
Brad Finstad, Angie Craig, Dean Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morton v. Rowley
as 1:2025cv00537
Plaintiff:
Justin J. Morton
Defendant:
Attorney Clayton Rowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2025cv00116
Plaintiff:
Amelia Curell, Kaylara Hoadley, Victoria Whitten and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Kim Reynolds, Brenna Bird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Saini et al v. Suburban Hospital, Inc. et al
as 8:2025cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ranjiv Saini and Sanjiv Saini
Defendant:
Suburban Hospital, Inc., Suburban Hospital Healthcare System, Inc., Johns Hopkins Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Welch v. Ruebart, et al.
as 25-1097
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
WILLIAM RUEBART, STEPHANIE ROMAN, also known as Roman, RAY RIVERA, also known as Rivera and others
John Doe v. Saige Star Rowley
as 2:2025cv01387
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Saige Star Rowley
Counter-Claimant:
Saige Star Rowley
Counter-Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rowley v. Mason County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2025cv05030
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe and Mason County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Rowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
