Cases 1 - 10 of 453
Latimore v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv02159
Petitioner:
Roy Latimore
Respondent:
Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Minter et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Terry Darnell Reynolds
Defendant:
Roy Mintor, Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department, Vincent Pelligrini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. ODOM
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
ROOSEVELT LEE, JR
Respondent:
ROY ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Odum
as 4:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
James A. Frazier
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roy Devon Hill
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Pat Labat, Lenwood Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Odum
as 1:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Odum
as 4:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
James A. Frazier
Respondent:
Warden Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Niang v. PhatMojo, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05446
Plaintiff:
Abdoulaye Niang
Defendant:
PhatMojo, LLC and Roy and Charcle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Jones v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
