Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Demona Freeman v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al
as 23-2512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMONA FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, formerly known as THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee for C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates Series, 2005-RPI, also known as BANK OF NEW YORK
Tangent Technologies LLC v. RPI Inc
as 1:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Tangent Technologies,LLC and Tangent Technologies LLC
Defendant:
RPI, Inc. and RPI Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Simmons v. Michigan State Houseing Development Authority et al
as 2:2023cv10448
Plaintiff:
Jelisa Simmons
Defendant:
Michigan State Houseing Development Authority, RPI Management Inc. and Joy West Manor
Roe v. RPI
as 1:2022cv00932
Defendant:
RPI and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Plaintiff:
J. Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roe v. RPI
as 4:2022cv04727
Plaintiff:
J. Roe
Defendant:
RPI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nakamoto et al v. The United States et al
as 1:2021cv04260
Plaintiff:
Satoshi Nakamoto and Robert Meyring
Defendant:
The United States, Coinbase, Brian Armstrong and others
Singleton v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Outback Steakhouse of Florida LLC, David A. Pogue, RPI Bryant Irvin, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Singleton and Brian K. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAP RPI RETL, LLC v. To Any Occupant
as 1:2018cv01656
Plaintiff:
GAP RPI RETL, LLC
Defendant:
To Any Occupant
Movant:
Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARCLAY et al v. RPI COMPANY et al
as 5:2017cv05485
Plaintiff:
ALAN W. BARCLAY and KIMBERLY BARCLAY
Defendant:
RPI COMPANY and KEVIN TASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nails v. RPI-Section & Housing
as 2:2017cv13702
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
RPI-Section & Housing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
